Volume 12, Issue 1, November 2014, Pages 284–294
Debabrata Sarddar1 and Rajesh Bose2
1 Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India
2 Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Data center, Kolkata, India
Original language: English
Copyright © 2014 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The recurring theme of server virtualization being a bundled single virtual machine file – consisting of the operating system, applications and settings – easily stored, deployable or transportable within the bounds of its operating parameters, the Achilles heel of such a VM (virtual machine) file is the likelihood of its getting corrupt or irrecoverably lost. Such disastrous occurrences are not unheard of, and are regularly tackled using a system of data backups to extenuate loss or corruption of entire VM files. However, the backing up process of VM files itself can compound recurring costs at an unexpected rate in the form of frequent acquisition of storage hardware in which to store the VM files. In this paper first we shows, a detailed cost comparison that based on power and cooling has been drawn in a table format between physical server and VMware server [VMware esx], secondly we analyze the role that the Billboard Manager has to play in shuttling the VM files in a secure and encrypted manner so as to extract the maximum operating potential of server virtualization and virtualization storage system in a private cloud domain.
Author Keywords: virtual machine, operating system, storage, Billboard Manager, VMware, virtualization, private cloud.
Debabrata Sarddar1 and Rajesh Bose2
1 Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India
2 Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Data center, Kolkata, India
Original language: English
Copyright © 2014 ISSR Journals. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
The recurring theme of server virtualization being a bundled single virtual machine file – consisting of the operating system, applications and settings – easily stored, deployable or transportable within the bounds of its operating parameters, the Achilles heel of such a VM (virtual machine) file is the likelihood of its getting corrupt or irrecoverably lost. Such disastrous occurrences are not unheard of, and are regularly tackled using a system of data backups to extenuate loss or corruption of entire VM files. However, the backing up process of VM files itself can compound recurring costs at an unexpected rate in the form of frequent acquisition of storage hardware in which to store the VM files. In this paper first we shows, a detailed cost comparison that based on power and cooling has been drawn in a table format between physical server and VMware server [VMware esx], secondly we analyze the role that the Billboard Manager has to play in shuttling the VM files in a secure and encrypted manner so as to extract the maximum operating potential of server virtualization and virtualization storage system in a private cloud domain.
Author Keywords: virtual machine, operating system, storage, Billboard Manager, VMware, virtualization, private cloud.
How to Cite this Article
Debabrata Sarddar and Rajesh Bose, “Architecture of Server Virtualization Technique Based on VMware ESXI server in the Private Cloud for an Organization,” International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 284–294, November 2014.
